RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04000
MEMBER:(DECEASED) COUNSEL: NONE
APPLICANT: HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. Her late husbands DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United
States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be amended to reflect
his prisoner of war (POW) status during the Korean conflict.
2. His military personnel record be amended to reflect his
grade as Technical Sergeant, E-6, his highest grade held instead
of Staff Sergeant, E-5.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her late husbands DD Form 214 does not state his POW status
during the Korean conflict while he was assigned with the
Strategic Airlift Commands (SAC) Office of Special
Investigations (OSI) from 1952 through 1956.
Additionally, his retirement grade should be corrected to
reflect Technical Sergeant. Based on retirement order dated
30 April 1968, his grade was amended before he retired on
1 June 1968. The record should be changed to read highest grade
held at and before retirement.
In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of
documents extracted from the decedents military personnel
record, a copy of his death certificate, and other supporting
documents.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Documents in the decedents military personnel record indicate
he was a member of the Army Air Corps, who served from
8 July 1941 until his release from active duty on 31 May 1968,
with an honorable characterization of service. He was retired
on 1 June 1968. During his active duty period, he participated
in the Chinese Communist Forces Spring Offensive from
22 April 1951 through 8 July 1951 and the United Nations Summer-
Fall Offensive from 9 July 1951 through 27 November 1951 through
27 November 1951. Information submitted by the applicant
reflects the decedent died on 11 October 1972.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
1. HQ AFPC/DPFCM recommends denial. DPFCM states there is no
evidence to confirm the military member was a POW. They
reviewed all POW databases for all conflicts/wars and the
military members name was not in any of them. Additionally, a
thorough review of his military personnel record and medical
record from the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA) found no documentation to support his ever being a POW.
2. Department of Defense Joint Publication 1-02 (as amended
through 22 March 2007) defines a prisoner of war as a detained
person as defined in Articles 4 and 5 of the Geneva Convention
Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War of August 12,
1949. In particular, one who, while engaged in combat under
orders of his or her government, is captured by the armed forces
of the enemy. In contrast, interned is defined, as the
casualty is definitely known to have been taken into custody of
a nonbelligerent foreign power as a result of and for reasons
arising out of any armed conflict in which the Armed Forces of
the United States are engaged. The eligibility criterion was
expanded in 1989 to include those individuals serving in any
capacity with the armed forces, who were taken and held captive
by foreign armed forces that are hostile to the United States,
under circumstances which the Secretary concerned finds to have
been comparable to those under which persons have been generally
held captive by enemy armed forces during periods of armed
conflict. Although Joint Publication 1-02 definitions are not
necessarily intended to be statements of policy, the definitions
nonetheless are consistent with the language of the 1919 Geneva
Prisoner of War Convention and other law-of-war treaties.
The complete AFPC/DPFCM evaluation is at Exhibit C.
1. HQ AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial. DPSOR states that the
member was retired in the grade of Staff Sergeant (SSgt) the
grade held at the time of retirement, which complies with 10
U.S.C. §8961. No evidence was provided to indicate an error
exists or an injustice occurred. At the time of the member's
retirement, 10 U.S.C. §8961, established a member's retired
grade as the grade held on date of retirement. 10 U.S.C. §8961
indicated the following: Unless entitled to a higher retired
grade under some other provision of law, a Regular or Reserve
of the Air Force who retire other than for physical disability
retires in the regular or reserve grade that he holds on the
date of his retirement. The member retired in the grade of SSgt
effective 1 June 1968 with 20 years, 10 months, and 6 days of
Total Active Federal Military Service (TAFMS).
2. The member was promoted to the grade of Technical Sergeant
(TSgt) effective 1 September 1957, and was demoted to the
temporary grade of SSgt, effective 13 November 1958, as the
result of disciplinary punishment relating to his failure to go
to his appointed place of duty. On 24 March 1960, the member
was awarded the permanent grade of SSgt, with a date of rank of
13 November 1958. Because the member held the grade of SSgt on
the date of his retirement, his record correctly reflects his
retired grade as SSgt. When originally published, his
retirement order contained erroneous information regarding his
highest grade held on active duty; however, it was properly
corrected through the amendment, Special Order AC-13307, dated
30 Apr 1968. No evidence was provided by the applicant or found
in the member's record to indicate the member regained the rank
of TSgt prior to his retirement.
The complete AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant for review and comment on 24 January 2014, (Exhibit
E). To date, a response has not been received.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations
of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the decedent has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. In view of the
above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s)
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 10 April 2014, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-04000 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 June 2013, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Decedents Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPFCM, dated 30 October 2013.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 7 November 2013.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 January 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00736
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00736 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late father be awarded the Prisoner of War (POW) Medal. POW status to internees in Switzerland requires the Secretary of the Air Force to determine that Swiss officials were acting on behalf of a foreign armed force hostile to the United States during...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02213
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02213 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. In contrast, interned is defined as the casualty is definitely known to have been taken into custody of a non belligerent foreign power as a result of and for reasons arising out of any armed conflict in which the Armed Forces of the United...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01883
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01883 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Prisoner of War (POW) Medal. POW status to internees in Switzerland requires the Secretary of the Air Force to determine that Swiss officials were acting on behalf of a foreign armed force hostile to the United States during World...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02199
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, reflects he entered active duty on 30 October 1951. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFC recommends denial of the applicant request for POW status.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03600
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03600 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Prisoner of War (POW) Medal and his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the POW Medal. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. If he had POW...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04359
After a thorough and careful review of the evidence of record and the applicant's extensive submission, we are not persuaded that his record should be corrected to reflect he was a Prisoner of War (POW) and awarded the POW medal. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance;...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00563
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Based on the Army’s definition of internment as a person interned as a POW or enemy alien, he should be identified as a former POW and receive the POW medal. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPF recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that Title 10, United States Code, Section 101(32), defines “former prisoner of war” as...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03899
The applicant’s records reflect award of the Air Force Commendation Medal, w/2OLC, the Air Force Achievement Medal with w/1OLC and the Air Force Good Conduct Medal w/2 Devices. After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the available evidence of record, the Board was not persuaded that he should be awarded the Prisoner-of-War Medal. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04213
The statute requires the Secretary concerned to issue a POW medal to any person who was taken prisoner and held captive by foreign armed forces that are hostile to the United States, under circumstances which the Secretary finds to have been comparable to those under which persons have generally been held captive by enemy armed forces during periods of armed conflict. Finally, while the claim the Secretary of the Air Force has made no such finding about whether internees of Switzerland meet...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089802C070403
The applicant states that during the Korean Conflict he was captured on 29 April 1951 by Chinese forces and was held captive as a prisoner of war (POW) until he was repatriated on 5 August 1953. Although the evidence of record does show that the applicant was medically retired subsequent to his repatriation, the evidence of record describing his disabilities does not rise to the level to qualify for award of the Purple Heart. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this...